Light Rail Framework Samples for Students †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Analyzed Light Rail Framework. Answer: Introduction It is not recently the general population that is content with light rail, yet in addition the world's naturalists and urban organizers who are similarly enchanted. For the removal of the problem the Light Rail Transit (LRT) framework with a passage underneath the downtown to dispense with clog in the city is implemented (Valleymetro.org 2017). The light rail project is the most cost effective solution and it helps in maintaining the sustainability of the environment and significant growth of the economy (Cao and Schoner 2014). Light rail is seen as effective as well as earth inviting as far as contamination and mixing into the current urban scene. The social and the culture would be benefitted with the implementation of the light rail project. In the assignment the proper working of the light rail is defined along with the conceptual design that would help to understand the working of the light rail network. A light rail project is analyzed that is created for covering an area of 15 Km around a city Manchesters. The success factors of the light rail project and the challenges faced for the management of the light rail network is also discussed in the report. Needs of Definition The feasibility of the light rail project is analyzed for the development of the project and the definition of the Light rail is given in the report for getting the proper idea about the LRT. The historical development of the LRT and the impact is also analyzed for the development of the system. The light rail transportation is defined as the most modern transportation and used for the carrying more number of passengers at a time and thus reducing the cost of the transportation (Seo, Golub and Kuby 2014). The LRT is uses the electricity for propelling the vehicle and work independently with versatility and greater flexibility. The possibility and opportunity for development of smart transportation system increases with the implementation of the light rail system (Nelson et al. 2015). A proper framework for the light rail system is required to be developed for getting the best output from the system. The light rail system are flexible because it can run in the middle of the busy stree t and also used as a high speed transport in the other parts of the city. The definition of the light rail system is used for differentiating the light rail transport from the other modes of transportation used in the city. Basically, the distinction encompasses the way that cable cars can just work at low speeds on roads, while LRT vehicles can work like an advanced cable car in addition to change over rapidly to fast running when given their own particular right-of-way (Hurst and West 2014). The trouble in making the qualification between light rail and cable car is probably going to stay, with numerous proceeding to see LRT as basically a super cable car. This refinement would turn out to be clearer in the accompanying segment that takes a gander at the chronicled advancement from cable car to light rail. The technical characteristics that is required for the light rail system are as follows: LRT is rail based and designed for running in tracks that have no vibrations. It is designed for turning easily around the corners i.e. not more than 25 meters of turning radius Adaptable up soak slopes Can go along avenues, keep running in its own save, keep running on a lifted track, go underground and share track with substantial rail and metro frameworks (Spears, Boarnet and Houston 2016). Runs on electricity of 600/750 V and can also use dual current for operation i.e. 750V/15KV The light rail system are modern, futuristic and quite The capacity of each of the light rail coach can be about 275 passengers in the crowded scenario and in normal it is about 150 to 200. The lower floor section are exceptionally regular now for most new light rail vehicles. It is ensured that there are no gaps between the platforms and the coach for ensuring the safety of the passengers (Currie and Delbosc 2013). The platform of the stations can become the integral path of the footpath. The maximum number of coaches of the light rail limits upto 5 and it depends on the route and the framework of the LRT. If the demand increases the frequency ca be increased for meeting the requirements. In the busy streets the LRT can run at a speed of 25 to 30 km/hr and the speed increases as the traffic decreases and it can reach a maximum speed of 100 km/hr. New technologies can be applied to increase the speed of transportation. The gaps between the headways can be about 1 minute and the tracks used are 1435mm standard gauge. The tram is considered as the predecessor of the light rail and it has got the flexibility to run in the cities and congested areas as well as the outskirts for performing like a faster commuter. New patterns in innovation are developing that could open up light rail frameworks to work with the adaptability of transports (Brown et al. 2015). For the accomplishment of the development of the light rail project the tracks used is evaluated and the technology used for the development of the framework such as the installation of the overhead links, installation of the changeover for utilizing the heavy tracks of the railways and control of the diesel engine is analyzed (Dziauddin, Alvanides and Powe 2013). Resistance acts on the numerous commentators have of LRT being restricted to a settled guide way track and having a constrained market. The new innovation technology are applied to the LRT framework increasing the efficiency of the light rail system and removing the risk associated with the light rail transportation. Conceptual Design The light rail project is designed for Manchesters and it is required to cover the main areas of the city as well as the commercial zones. The city is considered as the busiest and the LRT system is required to carry 30,000 to 40,000 passengers a day. The clog in the city in the rush hours is required to be eliminated with the implementation of the light rail system (Ramos-Santiago and Brown 2016). The light rail system is required to be implemented alongside with the streets and the busy routes for using less space in the city. The land is required to be used efficiently for the development of a healthier street environment and facilitate the movements of the pedestrians in the city. Cost of Construction Item Cost in Millions Cost Equivalent French Francs in A$ Land acquisition and survey 149.40 $ 33.79m Development of the bridge, station and tracks 595.50 $134.68m Development of the station infrastructure 15.50 $3.41m Development of the control signals and communications 79.60 $18.00m Labor 82.80 $18.73m Installation of the cable and the electrical power 33.50 $7.58m Installation of the vehicle car sets 235.00 $53.15m SUB TOTAL 1191.3 set-up costs $269.34m For the creation of an underground system the transit planners and the construction cost of the underground tunnel is required to be considered. In the most crowded streets there is a need for the implementation of elevated systems for avoiding the traffic issues and separation the entire track and take advantage of the driverless automated system (Brecher and Arthur 2014). Moreover the rail tracks can be shared for reducing the cost of the development and save space. The heavy rail and the metro rail tracks can be used by the LRT for entering the heart of the urban areas and it can become a better modal transfer medium. The cost of the development of the light rail system is considered for the preparation of the conceptual model. The basic design of the LRT depends on the following factors: Customers- The priority of the customers are required to be considered and the service required to be provided to the customer are listed below: Business, tourist, shopping purpose for the short trip passenger It is used by the suburb passengers as entertainment and work It is used by the students for reaching school or university on time It is used by the bypass passengers to shift from road to rail or rail to ferry Used by patients and commuters for avoiding delay in congestion Service proposed- The light rail is proposed at an interval of 2 3 minutes during the peak hours and at an interval of 7-8 minutes in the lean hours. It is required to provide faster transportation and reliable service to the passengers (Ewing, Tian and Spain 2014). Traffic management- The blockage in the roadways are required to be avoided for running the LRT and it is required to provide a comfortable experience to the passengers using the service. A proper plan is created for the management LRT and delivering an ecofriendly environment for the city. Ticketing system- The tickets is required to be available at the different outlets at an interval of 2 3 km and smart card can also be used by the customers for avoiding the ticket queues (Boarnet et al. 2013). The e ticketing system is required to be deployed and the server is required to be managed to record all the details. It is designed to connect all the roadways and the railways for reaching the different part of the city in a less time. For reducing the traffic the busiest part of the city is also required to be covered and electricity is required to be supplied for running the framework. Conclusion The development of the light rail transition helps in the development of a smart city and save the time and money of the people residing in the city. The investment in the city can be increased with the development of the project. The crowd in the streets and the roads can be reduced and thus the congestion is avoided. The economic growth of the city can be increased and jobs opportunity can also be increased with the development of the Light rail project. The long term challenges faced in the transportation industry can be solved with the implementation of the light rail project and it also makes the city prosperous and efficient. It makes the city a better place to live and work. The air pollution can also be reduced and helps in development of greener environment for the peoples living in the city. The emission of the greenhouse gases such as carbon monoxide, sulphur oxide and nitrous oxide can be reduced due to the less consumption of the fossil fuels. With the implementation of the advanced technology the speed of the light rail can be increased and the safety is also required to be considered for increasing the efficiency of the light rail network. Recommendations The recommendations provided for the improvement of the light rail project are as follows; Optimization of the performance of the network- the accommodation of the demand of the public and set the rail network according to the requirement is important for the development of the LRT framework. Delivering the network efficiencies- the train service is required to be separated for the suburban and the intercity for faster transportation and increase the capacity for addressing the constraint and get the maximum return of investment. Deployment of additional service- More frequent service during the peak time is required to be provided for meeting the demand of the commuters and additional service like booking from mobile application can be implemented for meeting the service cost. Covering the main areas- The light rail network is required to cover the main areas in the city for meeting the demand of the commuter and increase the efficiency of the light rail transit network References Apta.com. (2017). [online] Available at: https://www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/light_rail_bro.pdf [Accessed 5 Aug. 2017]. Boarnet, M.G., Hong, A., Lee, J., Wang, X., Houston, D. and Spears, S., 2013. The exposition light rail line study: a before and after study of the impact of new light rail transit service. Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California. Brecher, A. and Arthur, D., 2014. Review and evaluation of wireless power transfer (WPT) for electric transit applications (No. FTA Report No. 0060). Brown, B.B., Werner, C.M., Tribby, C.P., Miller, H.J. and Smith, K.R., 2015. Transit use, physical activity, and body mass index changes: objective measures associated with complete street light-rail construction. American journal of public health, 105(7), pp.1468-1474. Cao, X.J. and Schoner, J., 2014. The influence of light rail transit on transit use: An exploration of station area residents along the Hiawatha line in Minneapolis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 59, pp.134-143. Currie, G. and Delbosc, A., 2013. Exploring comparative ridership drivers of bus rapid transit and light rail transit routes. Journal of Public Transportation, 16(2), p.3. Dziauddin, M.F., Alvanides, S. and Powe, N., 2013. Estimating the effects of light rail transit (LRT) system on the property values in the Klang Valley, Malaysia: A hedonic house price approach. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering), 61(1), pp.35-47. Ewing, R., Tian, G. and Spain, A., 2014. Effect of Light-Rail Transit on Traffic in a Travel Corridor. Hurst, N.B. and West, S.E., 2014. Public transit and urban redevelopment: The effect of light rail transit on land use in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 46, pp.57-72. Ligneconfederationline.ca. (2017). [online] Available at: https://www.ligneconfederationline.ca/media/pdf/The%20Benefits%20of%20Light%20Rail%20-%20Web.pdf [Accessed 5 Aug. 2017]. Nelson, A.C., Eskic, D., Ganning, J.P., Hamidi, S., Petheram, S.J., Liu, J.H. and Ewing, R., 2015. Office rent premiums with respect to distance from light rail transit stations in Dallas and Denver. Planning.wa.gov.au. (2017). [online] Available at: https://planning.wa.gov.au/dop_pub_pdf/lightrail.pdf [Accessed 5 Aug. 2017]. Ramos-Santiago, L.E. and Brown, J., 2016. A comparative assessment of the factors associated with station-level streetcar versus light rail transit ridership in the United States. Urban studies, 53(5), pp.915-935. Seo, K., Golub, A. and Kuby, M., 2014. Combined impacts of highways and light rail transit on residential property values: A spatial hedonic price model for Phoenix, Arizona. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, pp.53-62. Spears, S., Boarnet, M.G. and Houston, D., 2016. Driving reduction after the introduction of light rail transit: Evidence from an experimental-control group evaluation of the Los Angeles Expo Line. Urban Studies, p.0042098016657261. Valleymetro.org. (2017). [online] Available at: https://www.valleymetro.org/images/uploads/lightrail_publications/METRO_Strategic_Plan.pdf [Accessed 5 Aug. 2017].